* Increment package version after release of azure-storage-common
* Increment package version after release of azure-storage-blobs
* Increment package version after release of azure-storage-files-datalake
* Increment package version after release of azure-storage-files-shares
* Revert the ordering change for beta.6.
Co-authored-by: Ahson Khan <ahkha@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Ahson Khan <ahson_ahmedk@yahoo.com>
* Fix the date in the changelog for storage beta.6 packages using the correct year to avoid auto version bump PR re-ordering it
* Fix the year for common beta.6
* Fix the CL year for shares beta.6
* Fix the CL year for datalake beta.6
* Fixup CHANGELOG.md, add SetPackageVersion, add calls to set-test-pipeline-version.yml
* Run set-test-pipeline-version.yml per artifact, open testpipeline as draft
* git diff to view changes in file
* Move set-test-pipeline-version.yml after Validate Clang Format
* remove second artifact loop in archetype-cpp-release.yml
* Update relative links to sections in the contributing guide doc to fix link verification
* Make some source code change modifications to trigger GenerateRelease CI steps
* Don't use relative paths in links, instead use the full path from master to be consistent with other places
* Update storage datalake CL to group changes to return types together
* Remove DataLake from the return types in CL
* Update CL for file shares to be accurate
* Fix file shares GetProperties breaking changes
# Pull Request Checklist
Please leverage this checklist as a reminder to address commonly occurring feedback when submitting a pull request to make sure your PR can be reviewed quickly:
See the detailed list in the [contributing guide](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-cpp/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-requests).
- [x] [C++ Guidelines](https://azure.github.io/azure-sdk/cpp_introduction.html)
- [x] Doxygen docs
- [x] Unit tests
- [x] No unwanted commits/changes
- [x] Descriptive title/description
- [x] PR is single purpose
- [x] Related issue listed
- [x] Comments in source
- [x] No typos
- [x] Update changelog
- [x] Not work-in-progress
- [x] External references or docs updated
- [x] Self review of PR done
- [x] Any breaking changes?
closes https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-cpp/issues/1869
# Pull Request Checklist
Please leverage this checklist as a reminder to address commonly occurring feedback when submitting a pull request to make sure your PR can be reviewed quickly:
See the detailed list in the [contributing guide](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-cpp/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-requests).
- [x] [C++ Guidelines](https://azure.github.io/azure-sdk/cpp_introduction.html)
- [x] Doxygen docs
- [x] Unit tests
- [x] No unwanted commits/changes
- [x] Descriptive title/description
- [x] PR is single purpose
- [x] Related issue listed
- [x] Comments in source
- [x] No typos
- [x] Update changelog
- [x] Not work-in-progress
- [x] External references or docs updated
- [x] Self review of PR done
- [x] Any breaking changes?
* Add back-ticks around `Response<void>` in changelog
* Remove extra whitespace after type name in identity CL.
* Add back-ticks around type name in identity CL.
Co-authored-by: Victor Vazquez <victor.vazquez@microsoft.com>
* Move changelog entry to correct place
* Reformat breaking changes
* New feature in the right place
* body_stream.hpp
* Backtick
* Add changes made for Context
* More updates
* More updates
Co-authored-by: Anton Kolesnyk <antkmsft@users.noreply.github.com>
* Moved the `Base64Encode()` and `Base64Decode()` functions to be static members of a `Convert` class within the `Azure::Core` namespace.
* Add the class name in the source file for posix.
Usability studies found that static methods are generally not as user-friendly as instance methods. Folks new to the SDK have harder time discovering the APIs, they reverse the flow of typing, and the calling code ends up a bit more verbose because you have to spell out the whole namespace and type name when there aren't any using directives.
There doesn't seem to be a strong benefit or feasibility reason to keep these method statics which are typically harder to use and discover.
cc @kyle-patterson
