* Simplify the design of Response<T> for usability.
* Revert changes to operation<T> to keep the changes single purpose.
* Update many of the response<T> call sites based on API changes.
* Update all remaining callsites and fix clang formatting.
* Update Response<T> documentation.
* Fix clang formatting.
* Remove status code from the Response<T> public surface area.
* Update the changelog.
* Fix up CL wording and remove commented-out change to operation<T>.
* Fixed test by actually calling a method.
* Fix up key vault test by not taking ownership of raw response.
* Fix call to get status code in test.
* Add new line at end of keyvualt live test file.
* Make a local copy within keyvault pipeline to avoid compilers re-ordering things.
* Make the fixes to the recent keyvault changes.
* Fix key vault pipeline to address ImportKey test failure
* Increment package version after release of azure-storage-common
* Increment package version after release of azure-storage-blobs
* Increment package version after release of azure-storage-files-datalake
* Increment package version after release of azure-storage-files-shares
* Revert the ordering change for beta.6.
Co-authored-by: Ahson Khan <ahkha@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Ahson Khan <ahson_ahmedk@yahoo.com>
* Fix the date in the changelog for storage beta.6 packages using the correct year to avoid auto version bump PR re-ordering it
* Fix the year for common beta.6
* Fix the CL year for shares beta.6
* Fix the CL year for datalake beta.6
* Update storage datalake CL to group changes to return types together
* Remove DataLake from the return types in CL
* Update CL for file shares to be accurate
* Fix file shares GetProperties breaking changes
# Pull Request Checklist
Please leverage this checklist as a reminder to address commonly occurring feedback when submitting a pull request to make sure your PR can be reviewed quickly:
See the detailed list in the [contributing guide](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-cpp/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-requests).
- [x] [C++ Guidelines](https://azure.github.io/azure-sdk/cpp_introduction.html)
- [x] Doxygen docs
- [x] Unit tests
- [x] No unwanted commits/changes
- [x] Descriptive title/description
- [x] PR is single purpose
- [x] Related issue listed
- [x] Comments in source
- [x] No typos
- [x] Update changelog
- [x] Not work-in-progress
- [x] External references or docs updated
- [x] Self review of PR done
- [x] Any breaking changes?
closes https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-cpp/issues/1869
# Pull Request Checklist
Please leverage this checklist as a reminder to address commonly occurring feedback when submitting a pull request to make sure your PR can be reviewed quickly:
See the detailed list in the [contributing guide](https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-cpp/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-requests).
- [x] [C++ Guidelines](https://azure.github.io/azure-sdk/cpp_introduction.html)
- [x] Doxygen docs
- [x] Unit tests
- [x] No unwanted commits/changes
- [x] Descriptive title/description
- [x] PR is single purpose
- [x] Related issue listed
- [x] Comments in source
- [x] No typos
- [x] Update changelog
- [x] Not work-in-progress
- [x] External references or docs updated
- [x] Self review of PR done
- [x] Any breaking changes?
* Move changelog entry to correct place
* Reformat breaking changes
* New feature in the right place
* body_stream.hpp
* Backtick
* Add changes made for Context
* More updates
* More updates
Co-authored-by: Anton Kolesnyk <antkmsft@users.noreply.github.com>
* Moved the `Base64Encode()` and `Base64Decode()` functions to be static members of a `Convert` class within the `Azure::Core` namespace.
* Add the class name in the source file for posix.
Usability studies found that static methods are generally not as user-friendly as instance methods. Folks new to the SDK have harder time discovering the APIs, they reverse the flow of typing, and the calling code ends up a bit more verbose because you have to spell out the whole namespace and type name when there aren't any using directives.
There doesn't seem to be a strong benefit or feasibility reason to keep these method statics which are typically harder to use and discover.
cc @kyle-patterson
