update CRD field comments
Signed-off-by: Tim Ramlot <42113979+inteon@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1aacfd826a
commit
e51f4a46db
@ -308,9 +308,6 @@ spec:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Cannot be set if the `subject` or `commonName` field is set.
|
||||
This is an Alpha Feature and is only enabled with the
|
||||
`--feature-gates=LiteralCertificateSubject=true` option set on both
|
||||
the controller and webhook components.
|
||||
type: string
|
||||
nameConstraints:
|
||||
description: |-
|
||||
|
||||
@ -117,9 +117,6 @@ type CertificateSpec struct {
|
||||
// More info: https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/issues/4424
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Cannot be set if the `subject` or `commonName` field is set.
|
||||
// This is an Alpha Feature and is only enabled with the
|
||||
// `--feature-gates=LiteralCertificateSubject=true` option set on both
|
||||
// the controller and webhook components.
|
||||
LiteralSubject string
|
||||
|
||||
// Requested common name X509 certificate subject attribute.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -84,9 +84,16 @@ type CertificateSpec struct {
|
||||
// +optional
|
||||
Subject *X509Subject `json:"subject,omitempty"`
|
||||
|
||||
// LiteralSubject is an LDAP formatted string that represents the [X.509 Subject field](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5280#section-4.1.2.6).
|
||||
// Use this *instead* of the Subject field if you need to ensure the correct ordering of the RDN sequence, such as when issuing certs for LDAP authentication. See https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/issues/3203, https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/issues/4424.
|
||||
// This field is alpha level and is only supported by cert-manager installations where LiteralCertificateSubject feature gate is enabled on both cert-manager controller and webhook.
|
||||
// Requested X.509 certificate subject, represented using the LDAP "String
|
||||
// Representation of a Distinguished Name" [1].
|
||||
// Important: the LDAP string format also specifies the order of the attributes
|
||||
// in the subject, this is important when issuing certs for LDAP authentication.
|
||||
// Example: `CN=foo,DC=corp,DC=example,DC=com`
|
||||
// More info [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4514
|
||||
// More info: https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/issues/3203
|
||||
// More info: https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/issues/4424
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Cannot be set if the `subject` or `commonName` field is set.
|
||||
// +optional
|
||||
LiteralSubject string `json:"literalSubject,omitempty"`
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -86,9 +86,16 @@ type CertificateSpec struct {
|
||||
// +optional
|
||||
Subject *X509Subject `json:"subject,omitempty"`
|
||||
|
||||
// LiteralSubject is an LDAP formatted string that represents the [X.509 Subject field](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5280#section-4.1.2.6).
|
||||
// Use this *instead* of the Subject field if you need to ensure the correct ordering of the RDN sequence, such as when issuing certs for LDAP authentication. See https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/issues/3203, https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/issues/4424.
|
||||
// This field is alpha level and is only supported by cert-manager installations where LiteralCertificateSubject feature gate is enabled on both cert-manager controller and webhook.
|
||||
// Requested X.509 certificate subject, represented using the LDAP "String
|
||||
// Representation of a Distinguished Name" [1].
|
||||
// Important: the LDAP string format also specifies the order of the attributes
|
||||
// in the subject, this is important when issuing certs for LDAP authentication.
|
||||
// Example: `CN=foo,DC=corp,DC=example,DC=com`
|
||||
// More info [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4514
|
||||
// More info: https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/issues/3203
|
||||
// More info: https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/issues/4424
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Cannot be set if the `subject` or `commonName` field is set.
|
||||
// +optional
|
||||
LiteralSubject string `json:"literalSubject,omitempty"`
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -87,9 +87,16 @@ type CertificateSpec struct {
|
||||
// +optional
|
||||
Subject *X509Subject `json:"subject,omitempty"`
|
||||
|
||||
// LiteralSubject is an LDAP formatted string that represents the [X.509 Subject field](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5280#section-4.1.2.6).
|
||||
// Use this *instead* of the Subject field if you need to ensure the correct ordering of the RDN sequence, such as when issuing certs for LDAP authentication. See https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/issues/3203, https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/issues/4424.
|
||||
// This field is alpha level and is only supported by cert-manager installations where LiteralCertificateSubject feature gate is enabled on both cert-manager controller and webhook.
|
||||
// Requested X.509 certificate subject, represented using the LDAP "String
|
||||
// Representation of a Distinguished Name" [1].
|
||||
// Important: the LDAP string format also specifies the order of the attributes
|
||||
// in the subject, this is important when issuing certs for LDAP authentication.
|
||||
// Example: `CN=foo,DC=corp,DC=example,DC=com`
|
||||
// More info [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4514
|
||||
// More info: https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/issues/3203
|
||||
// More info: https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/issues/4424
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Cannot be set if the `subject` or `commonName` field is set.
|
||||
// +optional
|
||||
LiteralSubject string `json:"literalSubject,omitempty"`
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -128,9 +128,6 @@ type CertificateSpec struct {
|
||||
// More info: https://github.com/cert-manager/cert-manager/issues/4424
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Cannot be set if the `subject` or `commonName` field is set.
|
||||
// This is an Alpha Feature and is only enabled with the
|
||||
// `--feature-gates=LiteralCertificateSubject=true` option set on both
|
||||
// the controller and webhook components.
|
||||
// +optional
|
||||
LiteralSubject string `json:"literalSubject,omitempty"`
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user