[jOOQ/jOOQ#12611] SQLDataType.null generated when using XMLDatabase with
lower case array type
This commit is contained in:
parent
2aa166f846
commit
f2a7dfd881
@ -514,16 +514,16 @@ class GenerationUtil {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// But there are also arrays with a "vector" suffix
|
||||
else {
|
||||
else
|
||||
return u;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
case H2:
|
||||
return name(H2DataType.OTHER.getTypeName());
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
case HSQLDB: {
|
||||
case HSQLDB:
|
||||
default: {
|
||||
|
||||
// In HSQLDB 2.2.5, there has been an incompatible INFORMATION_SCHEMA change around the
|
||||
// ELEMENT_TYPES view. Arrays are now described much more explicitly
|
||||
@ -532,11 +532,9 @@ class GenerationUtil {
|
||||
|
||||
// This is for backwards compatibility
|
||||
else
|
||||
return name(t.replace(" ARRAY", ""));
|
||||
return name(t.replaceFirst("(?i: ARRAY)", ""));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
throw new SQLDialectNotSupportedException("getArrayBaseType() is not supported for dialect " + dialect);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static ExpressionType expressionType(String expression) {
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2796,16 +2796,15 @@ public abstract class AbstractDatabase implements Database {
|
||||
case H2:
|
||||
case POSTGRES:
|
||||
case YUGABYTE:
|
||||
return "ARRAY".equals(dataType);
|
||||
return "ARRAY".equals(dataType.toUpperCase());
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
case HSQLDB:
|
||||
default:
|
||||
// TODO: Is there any more robust way to recognise these?
|
||||
// For instance, there could be a UDT that is called this way
|
||||
return dataType.endsWith(" ARRAY");
|
||||
return dataType.toUpperCase().endsWith(" ARRAY");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protected static final String fetchedSize(Collection<?> fetched, Collection<?> included) {
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user