github/jooq
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[jOOQ/jOOQ#17251] Better implementation using USE schema

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Lukas Eder 2024-09-17 12:51:48 +02:00
parent da262ac04b
commit e4d98094eb
1 changed files with 6 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
jOOQ-meta/src/main/java/org/jooq/meta/duckdb/DuckDBUDTDefinition.java
View File

@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
*/
package org.jooq.meta.duckdb;
import static org.jooq.impl.DSL.currentSchema;
import static org.jooq.impl.DSL.name;
import static org.jooq.impl.DSL.unquotedName;
import static org.jooq.meta.duckdb.system.main.Tables.DUCKDB_COLUMNS;
@ -79,11 +80,13 @@ public class DuckDBUDTDefinition extends AbstractUDTDefinition {
// a dummy table containing a reference to the UDT in order to reverse engineer
// its structure, see https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/discussions/8832
// [#17251] Cross schema references still don't work: https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/issues/13981
Name name = unquotedName(getSchema().getName(), "dummy_" + Math.abs(new Random().nextInt()));
String currentSchema = create().fetchValue(currentSchema());
Name name = unquotedName("dummy_" + Math.abs(new Random().nextInt()));
try {
create().setSchema(getSchema().getName()).execute();
create().createTable(name)
.column("dummy", new DefaultDataType<>(null, Object.class, unquotedName(getSchema().getName(), getName()).toString()))
.column("dummy", new DefaultDataType<>(null, Object.class, getName()))
.execute();
String struct =
@ -135,6 +138,7 @@ public class DuckDBUDTDefinition extends AbstractUDTDefinition {
}
}
finally {
create().setSchema(currentSchema).execute();
create().dropTableIfExists(name).execute();
}