From c5a35289fa757bbf2854e957354fa8816e9aee2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Knut Wannheden <knut.wannheden@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 16:15:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [jOOQ/jOOQ#9597] Fix bug in
 DefaultRelations#getCheckConstraints()

All check constraints ended up being owned by the same table.
---
 .../src/main/java/org/jooq/meta/DefaultRelations.java     | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/jOOQ-meta/src/main/java/org/jooq/meta/DefaultRelations.java b/jOOQ-meta/src/main/java/org/jooq/meta/DefaultRelations.java
index 4ca4ae944b..ec02e07234 100644
--- a/jOOQ-meta/src/main/java/org/jooq/meta/DefaultRelations.java
+++ b/jOOQ-meta/src/main/java/org/jooq/meta/DefaultRelations.java
@@ -323,15 +323,15 @@ public class DefaultRelations implements Relations {
         if (checkConstraintsByTable == null) {
             checkConstraintsByTable = new LinkedHashMap<>();
 
-            for (CheckConstraintDefinition constraint : checkConstraints.values()) {
-                List<CheckConstraintDefinition> list = checkConstraintsByTable.get(table);
+            for (Map.Entry<Key, CheckConstraintDefinition> entry : checkConstraints.entrySet()) {
+                List<CheckConstraintDefinition> list = checkConstraintsByTable.get(entry.getKey().table);
 
                 if (list == null) {
                     list = new ArrayList<>();
-                    checkConstraintsByTable.put(table, list);
+                    checkConstraintsByTable.put(entry.getKey().table, list);
                 }
 
-                list.add(constraint);
+                list.add(entry.getValue());
             }
         }