[jOOQ/jOOQ#644] Generated RECORD_TYPE classes don't need to be generic
This commit is contained in:
parent
dba849cf5d
commit
89a4785f30
@ -2199,9 +2199,9 @@ public class JavaGenerator extends AbstractGenerator {
|
||||
printClassAnnotations(out, udt, Mode.RECORD_TYPE);
|
||||
|
||||
if (scala)
|
||||
out.println("%strait %s[R <: %s[R] ] extends [[separator= with ][%s]] {", visibility(), className, UDTRecord.class, interfaces);
|
||||
out.println("%strait %s[R <: %s[R] ][[before= extends ][separator= with ][%s]] {", visibility(), className, interfaces);
|
||||
else if (kotlin)
|
||||
out.println("%sinterface %s<R : %s<R>> : [[%s]] {", visibility(), className, UDTRecord.class, interfaces);
|
||||
out.println("%sinterface %s<R : %s<R>>[[before= : ][%s]] {", visibility(), className, interfaces);
|
||||
else
|
||||
out.println("%sinterface %s[[before= extends ][%s]] {", visibility(), className, interfaces);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user