github/jooq
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[jOOQ/jOOQ#10438] Support lazy conversion of built-in data types

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Lukas Eder 2020-07-23 17:41:04 +02:00
parent af2f5bc935
commit 748ec93283
1 changed files with 16 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

19
jOOQ/src/main/java/org/jooq/impl/Val.java
View File

@ -82,7 +82,12 @@ final class Val<T> extends AbstractParam<T> {
*/
@SuppressWarnings({ "rawtypes", "unchecked" })
final <U> Val<U> convertTo(DataType<U> type) {
// [#10438] A user defined data type could was not provided explicitly,
// when wrapping a bind value in DSL::val or DSL::inline
if (getDataType() instanceof DataTypeProxy) {
// [#9492] Maintain legacy static type registry behaviour for now
if (((DataTypeProxy<?>) getDataType()).type instanceof LegacyConvertedDataType && type == SQLDataType.OTHER) {
type = (DataType) ((DataTypeProxy<?>) getDataType()).type;
@ -90,14 +95,22 @@ final class Val<T> extends AbstractParam<T> {
log.warn("Deprecation", "User-defined, converted data type " + type.getType() + " was registered statically, which will be unsupported in the future, see https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/9492. Please use explicit data types in generated code, or e.g. with DSL.val(Object, DataType), or DSL.inline(Object, DataType).", new SQLWarning("Static type registry usage"));
}
Val<U> w = new Val<>(type.convert(getValue()), type, getParamName());
w.setInline(isInline());
return w;
return convertTo0(type);
}
// [#10438] A data type conversion between built in data types was made
else if (type instanceof ConvertedDataType)
return convertTo0(type);
else
return (Val) this;
}
private final <U> Val<U> convertTo0(DataType<U> type) {
Val<U> w = new Val<>(type.convert(getValue()), type, getParamName());
w.setInline(isInline());
return w;
}
@Override
public void accept(Context<?> ctx) {
if (EmbeddableRecord.class.isAssignableFrom(getType())) {