github/jooq
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[#1111] VARRAY element type information is lost when unnesting VARRAY's returned from functions in Oracle

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Lukas Eder 2012-02-03 17:46:40 +00:00
parent 63b09b69ac
commit 71c9bda264
1 changed files with 11 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
jOOQ/src/main/java/org/jooq/impl/ArrayTable.java
View File

@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ package org.jooq.impl;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;
import org.jooq.ArrayRecord;
import org.jooq.Attachable;
import org.jooq.BindContext;
import org.jooq.Configuration;
@ -75,6 +76,8 @@ class ArrayTable extends AbstractTable<Record> {
super(alias);
Class<?> arrayType;
// TODO [#523] Solve this in a more object-oriented way...
if (array.getDataType().getType().isArray()) {
arrayType = array.getDataType().getType().getComponentType();
}
@ -84,6 +87,14 @@ class ArrayTable extends AbstractTable<Record> {
arrayType = array.getDataType().getType();
}
// [#1111] Keep track of element type information of Oracle
// VARRAY / TABLE types returned from functions
else if (ArrayRecord.class.isAssignableFrom(array.getDataType().getType())) {
// TODO [#523] This information should be available in ARRAY meta-data
ArrayRecord<?> dummy = Util.newArrayRecord((Class<ArrayRecord<?>>) array.getDataType().getType(), DefaultConfiguration.DEFAULT_CONFIGURATION);
arrayType = dummy.getDataType().getType();
}
// Is this case possible?
else {
arrayType = Object.class;