[jOOQ/jOOQ#11582] Avoid auxiliary derived table in SQLite
GENERATE_SERIES emulation
This commit is contained in:
parent
6e74da4910
commit
4443fa6eed
@ -1650,10 +1650,10 @@ final class SelectQueryImpl<R extends Record> extends AbstractResultQuery<R> imp
|
||||
// ----------------------------------------------
|
||||
// DISTINCT seems irrelevant here (to be proven)
|
||||
|
||||
c.visit(getLimit().withTies()
|
||||
? DSL.rank().over(orderBy(getNonEmptyOrderBy(c.configuration())))
|
||||
: distinct
|
||||
c.visit(distinct
|
||||
? DSL.denseRank().over(orderBy(getNonEmptyOrderByForDistinct(c.configuration())))
|
||||
: getLimit().withTies()
|
||||
? DSL.rank().over(orderBy(getNonEmptyOrderBy(c.configuration())))
|
||||
: DSL.rowNumber().over(orderBy(getNonEmptyOrderBy(c.configuration())))
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2914,12 +2914,14 @@ final class SelectQueryImpl<R extends Record> extends AbstractResultQuery<R> imp
|
||||
|
||||
derivedTableRequired |= derivedTableRequired
|
||||
|
||||
// [#3579] [#6431] [#7222] Some databases don't support nested set operations at all
|
||||
// because they do not allow wrapping set op subqueries in parentheses
|
||||
|| NO_SUPPORT_UNION_PARENTHESES.contains(ctx.dialect())
|
||||
// [#3579] [#6431] [#7222] [#11582]
|
||||
// Some databases don't support nested set operations at all because
|
||||
// they do not allow wrapping set op subqueries in parentheses
|
||||
|| parensRequired && NO_SUPPORT_UNION_PARENTHESES.contains(ctx.dialect())
|
||||
|
||||
// [#3579] [#6431] [#7222] Nested set operations aren't supported, but parenthesised
|
||||
// set op subqueries are.
|
||||
// [#3579] [#6431] [#7222]
|
||||
// Nested set operations aren't supported, but parenthesised set op
|
||||
// subqueries are.
|
||||
|| (TRUE.equals(ctx.data(DATA_NESTED_SET_OPERATIONS)) && UNION_PARENTHESIS.contains(ctx.dialect()))
|
||||
|
||||
// [#2995] Ambiguity may need to be resolved when parentheses could mean both:
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user