github/jooq
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[jOOQ/jOOQ#15732] Hint at limited UDT support:

Browse Source 
https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/discussions/8832
This commit is contained in:
Lukas Eder 2024-03-27 14:51:23 +01:00
parent 143187c08b
commit 4034c8eb47
1 changed files with 39 additions and 29 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

68
jOOQ-meta/src/main/java/org/jooq/meta/duckdb/DuckDBUDTDefinition.java
View File

@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ import java.util.Random;
import org.jooq.Field;
import org.jooq.Name;
import org.jooq.impl.DefaultDataType;
import org.jooq.impl.ParserException;
import org.jooq.impl.QOM;
import org.jooq.meta.AbstractDatabase;
import org.jooq.meta.AbstractUDTDefinition;
import org.jooq.meta.AttributeDefinition;
import org.jooq.meta.DataTypeDefinition;
@ -57,9 +59,12 @@ import org.jooq.meta.DefaultAttributeDefinition;
import org.jooq.meta.DefaultDataTypeDefinition;
import org.jooq.meta.RoutineDefinition;
import org.jooq.meta.SchemaDefinition;
import org.jooq.tools.JooqLogger;
public class DuckDBUDTDefinition extends AbstractUDTDefinition {
private static final JooqLogger log = JooqLogger.getLogger(DuckDBUDTDefinition.class);
public DuckDBUDTDefinition(SchemaDefinition schema, String name, String comment) {
super(schema, null, name, comment);
}
@ -86,39 +91,44 @@ public class DuckDBUDTDefinition extends AbstractUDTDefinition {
.fetchSingle()
.value1();
QOM.CreateType ct = (QOM.CreateType)
create().parser()
.parseQuery("create type t as " + struct);
try {
QOM.CreateType ct = (QOM.CreateType)
create().parser()
.parseQuery("create type t as " + struct);
int i = 1;
for (Field<?> a : ct.$attributes()) {
SchemaDefinition typeSchema = null;
int i = 1;
for (Field<?> a : ct.$attributes()) {
SchemaDefinition typeSchema = null;
Name qualifiedName = a.getDataType().getQualifiedName();
if (qualifiedName.qualified())
typeSchema = getDatabase().getSchema(qualifiedName.qualifier().last());
Name qualifiedName = a.getDataType().getQualifiedName();
if (qualifiedName.qualified())
typeSchema = getDatabase().getSchema(qualifiedName.qualifier().last());
DataTypeDefinition type = new DefaultDataTypeDefinition(
getDatabase(),
typeSchema == null ? getSchema() : typeSchema,
qualifiedName.last(),
a.getDataType().length(),
a.getDataType().precision(),
a.getDataType().scale(),
a.getDataType().nullable(),
a.getDataType().defaulted() ? a.getDataType().default_().toString() : null,
name(
qualifiedName.qualified() ? qualifiedName.qualifier().last() : null,
qualifiedName.last()
)
);
DataTypeDefinition type = new DefaultDataTypeDefinition(
getDatabase(),
typeSchema == null ? getSchema() : typeSchema,
qualifiedName.last(),
a.getDataType().length(),
a.getDataType().precision(),
a.getDataType().scale(),
a.getDataType().nullable(),
a.getDataType().defaulted() ? a.getDataType().default_().toString() : null,
name(
qualifiedName.qualified() ? qualifiedName.qualifier().last() : null,
qualifiedName.last()
)
);
result.add(new DefaultAttributeDefinition(
this,
a.getName(),
i++,
type
));
result.add(new DefaultAttributeDefinition(
this,
a.getName(),
i++,
type
));
}
}
catch (ParserException e) {
log.info("Error while parsing UDT. DuckDB UDTs cannot be reverse engineered reliably very easily without sufficient information in the information_schema. Please upvote this feature request to improve support for nested UDTs, etc: https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/discussions/8832", e);
}
}
finally {