* Fix property name for skipVerifyChangeLog
* Apply suggestion from @raych1
* Refactor ShouldVerifyChangeLog function condition
* Apply suggestion from @raych1
---------
Co-authored-by: Ray Chen <raychen@microsoft.com>
* change our verifyChangelogs over to utilizing the artifact details. if we don't have an artifact details at all, don't verify changelog. if we do, but skipverifychangelog is present, don't verify changelog. if we have artifact details, but no disable, verify the changelog
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Beddall <scbedd@microsoft.com>
* don't verify changelog for packages that aren't actively published anymore
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Beddall <scbedd@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Scott Beddall <45376673+scbedd@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben Broderick Phillips <ben@benbp.net>
* more compatibility with expanding/contracting packages. add ability for packages to have DependentPackages that must be included in the set of packages that should be built given a changeset
---------
Co-authored-by: Scott Beddall <scbedd@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Scott Beddall <45376673+scbedd@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Wes Haggard <weshaggard@users.noreply.github.com>
