SteNicholas dfb18072e2 [CELEBORN-932][FOLLOWUP] Remove StatusSystem#handleWorkerRemove from RegisterWorker to avoid duplicated behavior in RegisterWorker ... ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Remove `StatusSystem#handleWorkerRemove` from `RegisterWorker` to avoid duplicated behavior in `RegisterWorker`. ### Why are the changes needed? `RegisterWorker` has already been improved to cover the behavior of `StatusSystem#handleWorkerRemove`. Therefore, `StatusSystem#handleWorkerRemove` is recommend to remove from `RegisterWorker` for avoiding duplicated behavior in `RegisterWorker`. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? CI. Closes #2731 from SteNicholas/CELEBORN-932. Authored-by: SteNicholas <programgeek@163.com> Signed-off-by: mingji <fengmingxiao.fmx@alibaba-inc.com>		2024-09-18 14:53:04 +08:00
..
main	[CELEBORN-932][FOLLOWUP] Remove StatusSystem#handleWorkerRemove from RegisterWorker to avoid duplicated behavior in RegisterWorker	2024-09-18 14:53:04 +08:00
test	[CELEBORN-1477][FOLLOWUP] /api/v1/workers/events should support None eventType to align /sendWorkerEvent	2024-09-14 11:14:23 +08:00